ANSWER GEEK

 

Answer geeks (and we use that term with great respect): Where would we be without them? They help guide us through the challenges of online learning, the Internet, courseware development, and those other intersections of learning and technology. Have a question about e-learning? Maybe we can help. Email us at  answergeek@astd.org! We’ll publish some of the best Q&A.

 

QUESTION

 

What are the criteria for determining when e-learning versus instructor-led training is appropriate?

 

ANSWERS 

Martin

 

The first step is to determine what type of skills or knowledge needs to be imparted to learners. We often know intuitively, as David Brooks writes in Web-Teaching, that “certain kinds of teaching and interaction require face-to-face meetings and cannot be conducted electronically.”  In a Learning Circuits E-learning 1.0 column, “Tips to Make E-learning Stick,” Susan Boyd says to “consider whether topics need in-person interaction and support (face-to-face), require guided instruction and facilitation (synchronous e-learning), or can be done independently with minimal support (asynchronous e-learning).”

 

In Web-Based Training, Margaret Driscoll spells out that “Web-based training is not the solution for every training problem, but it is appropriate for teaching certain skills and imparting particular kinds of knowledge, such as software applications, management skills, or business writing.”  Driscoll goes on to discuss different types of learning and indicates that cognitive skills, such as completing a tax form, are well-suited to e-learning, but that psychomotor (hitting a golf ball) and attitudinal skills (valuing diversity) are not as well suited.

 


 
Yakimovicz

 

A few criteria I use:

 

E-learning

 

● The content can be reused repeatedly (revision of e-learning is tedious and costly).

● Enough time is available for development or good off-the-shelf programs are  available (e-learning often takes longer to create).

● The audience is separated either by geography or time (e-learning can work well for training multiple shifts).

● Skill can be built through practice online.

● The organization is time-bound and can spare little time for training.

● The topic can be split easily into subsections for start-and-stop learning.

● The organization supports and values e-learning.

● Resources are available for development (software tools, instructional

design skills, and so forth).

 

Classroom training

 

● The content is specific to a job function or group of performers and may change.

● Little time is available for development, but content knowledge can be readily tapped and delivered.

● The audience is in one place.

● Job performance would benefit from participants’ face-to-face interaction.

● Skills need to be learned using materials or tools not available online, or not easily simulated.

● The organization is willing to take the time for classroom training (can spare a group of employees at the same time).

● Skill development requires a large amount of time at once.

● The organization isn’t committed to the value of e-learning (for example, a small organization in one location with little training budget).

● The in-house training staff is quick to develop high-quality classroom programs.

 


  

Irbe

 

I’ve composed this chart from the Answer Geek archives. (Answers from Donna McIntire, Lillian Swider, and Dean Turner.)

 

Training Solution

Definition

Strengths

Weaknesses

Classroom/

Face-to-Face

(F2F)

 

Traditional way to train. The

instructor is in the same geographical

location at the same time as the learner.

live interaction in real time

•less individualized attention

instructor-driven, not learner-centered

 

Distance

Education

 

Correspondence courses. The instructor and learner are not in the same

geographical location. Methods of delivery include regular mail, satellite, Internet.

flexible means of receiving training

accessible to more learners

 

not always technology-based

 

Computer-

Based Training

(CBT)

 

Training delivered via CD-ROM, disk, or network. Usually self-contained and self-paced.

self-paced learning

a more flexible way to provide

and receive training

 

expensive to continuously update and

redistribute CD-ROMs or disks with new materials

 

Electronic

Performance

Support System

(EPSS)

 

Online, interactive help (for example, the paper clip in MS Word). Usually provides step-by-step instructions.

24/7 help

instant answers to specific questions

or issues

 

no human interaction

little educational value-add

 

Web-Based

Training (WBT)/

Online Learning

 

Training via the Internet. Methods of delivery include downloads, streaming

multimedia (video, audio, slide show,

and/or animation).

Two types: synchronous (real- time) or

asynchronous (delayed).

increased potential to develop and

add new training

easy to update content

a more flexible means of providing

and receiving training

 

creation of totally new course

materials necessitates increased

development time

 

E-learning

 

Most recent addition to the list of terminology. Can be synonymous with WBT, but is often more focused on accelerated knowledge sharing and preservation of intellectual capital.

increased potential to develop and

add new training

a more flexible means of providing

and receiving training

 

creation of totally new course

material necessitates increased

development time

 

Blended/

Integrated

 

Mix of delivery methods (for example, a

F2F classroom course supplemented by

online components)

flexible

higher comfort level for some

learners

creation of totally new course

material necessitates increased

development time

 

 

Published: November 2004

Beth Martin is a senior usability specialist at UserWorks focusing on accessibility and user-centered design; bmartin@userworks.com.

 

Ann Yakimovicz is training manager of operations for First American Flood Data Services, a company in the First American Corporation; annyak@ix.netcom.com.

 

Aina Irbe is an instructional design analyst and adjunct faculty in the George Washington University Educational Technology Leadership M.Ed. program; agilat@concentric.net.


Terms and Conditions ASTD